Designing Intentional Workspace

One idea from a recent Adam Grant NYT opinion piece (2026) has been rattling around in my head: "The responsibility of leaders is not to mold the world to their needs. It's to adapt themselves to the world's needs."

The debate around remote and hybrid work often becomes a debate about preferences: What leaders prefer. What employees prefer. The more interesting question is whether we're following evidence.

The article cites research spanning more than 450 companies and 3 million employees, finding that broad return-to-office mandates generally did not improve financial performance or ROI while increasing turnover and reducing employee satisfaction. 

That doesn't mean every role should be remote. It doesn't mean in-person collaboration has no value. Most of us can point to moments when being together matters. It's common sense from our lived experience. 

But effective leadership requires adapting to changing conditions rather than assuming yesterday's management practices will produce tomorrow's results.

One consideration that deserves more attention: flexibility is not experienced equally. Women, caregivers, and many employees with disabilities often bear a disproportionate share of the costs when flexibility disappears.

As organizations continue to evolve, I think the challenge is less about choosing between remote and in-person work and more about designing work intentionally based around targeted business results. It's building a leadership system that can adapt rather than staying stuck in yesterday's model. 

The best workplace strategy isn't the one that leaders like most; it's the one that helps people do their best work while producing the best outcomes.

#OrganizationalChange #RTO #Hybrid #Remote #Leadership

Visit this post on LinkedIn.